Assessing the political and economic effects of protection against Third World exports
In: FGG papers 86,1
44 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: FGG papers 86,1
World Affairs Online
In: IIVG papers / Discussion papers, 82,110
World Affairs Online
In: IIVG papers / Discussion papers, 82,102
World Affairs Online
In: IIVG Discussion Papers + IIVG Preprints
World Affairs Online
In: Conflict management and peace science: the official journal of the Peace Science Society (International), Band 25, Heft 3, S. 191-205
ISSN: 1549-9219
In: Theory and Evidence in Comparative Politics and International Relations, S. 87-106
In: Perspectives on politics, Band 4, Heft 2
ISSN: 1541-0986
In: Perspectives on politics: a political science public sphere, Band 4, Heft 2, S. 420
ISSN: 1537-5927
In: Perspectives on politics: a political science public sphere, Band 4, Heft 2, S. 420-421
ISSN: 1537-5927
In: International politics, Band 40, Heft 3, S. 446-447
ISSN: 1384-5748
In: American political science review, Band 96, Heft 2, S. 476-477
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: American political science review, Band 96, Heft 2, S. 476-477
ISSN: 0003-0554
In: The journal of conflict resolution: journal of the Peace Science Society (International), Band 45, Heft 6, S. 834-859
ISSN: 0022-0027, 0731-4086
World Affairs Online
How does the 1973-1991 global financial situation compare with that of 1870-1914? Is political liberalization one of the major sources for the economic expansion that occurred during these two time periods? In an effort to answer these questions, terminology is defined to encourage a comparative analysis. Global capital flow data for each economic era are examined to determine whether the contemporary economic boom differs from the earlier boom. The two institutional frameworks are considered, & the political effects of each financial era are outlined. It is determined that stark similarities & differences between the two eras are evident. This comparative analysis highlights the relationship that exists between world politics & economic interdependence. 3 Tables, 2 Figures, 21 References. K. Larsen
In: American political science review, Band 90, Heft 1, S. 103-117
ISSN: 1537-5943
Several recent explanations for major-power war focus on purported cycles in global economic activity or in global political order. I shall argue that a better understanding of interrelationships among the economic long wave, the global leadership cycle, and armed conflict can be gained if we (1) expand the study of interstate conflict beyond the limited domain of great power or systemic wars and (2) treat the long wave and the leadership cycle as quasi-independent and interrelated processes, each contributing to the conflict dynamics of the interstate system. Theoretical foundations for these two recommendations are drawn from the core works in this field. A model based on this new approach is developed and tested empirically along with four formal representations of the core frameworks. Poisson regression is employed using data on interstate disputes (1816–1976) to test resulting hypotheses. Analysis shows that broadening the explanatory domains of existing frameworks is valid and that the "coevolving systems" model is measurably superior to all tested competitors. I conclude that these two global processes are best viewed as coevolving systems and that future studies of systemic conflict should take this approach.